I am

I.
To move in all directions qua knowing presents the imminent consequence of epistemic relativism.
But the fact that it appears that we can extend from a base, presents ontological imminence as well.
I believe.
So it is not that:
Since things can be known in many different ways they become difference in themselves, or meaninglessness, otherwise a lack of a hold on what can really be.
Things more accurately contain a multitudinality in themselves, at once containing a singular essence and hinging in all directions in relationality.
So, it is that:
What there really is, is what is being known, regardless of how many ways it can be known.
And this appears to be stratified, holographic, fluid, and changing.
Again, the more useful conclusion is that something most definitely is.
Descartes doubt of things was thus not the best way to approach our deep questions.
Faith is.

II.
It is too bad though, because a long time ago, when he lost to love, and couldn’t let go, the narrator sold his soul, just to let go .